Pavia, 11 September 2014
Program — | Download
Abstract booklet — | Download
Voice systems have been thoroughly studied, both in a crosslinguistic and a variational perspective (Siewierska 1984, Comrie 1985, Keenan & Dryer 2007, Perlmutter & Rosen 1984, Foley & Van Valin 1985, Shibatani 1985, 1988, Tsunoda 1988, Klaiman 1991, Kemmer 1993, Fox & Hopper 1994, Barðdal 2004, Creissels 2007, Austin & Musgrave 2008, Adelaar 2013, among others).
Albeit less extensively, diachronic aspects of specific voice patterns in individual languages have also been discussed (Cennamo 1993, 2005, 2007, 2012, Allen 2001, Ross 2002, Faarlund 2005, Abraham 2006b, Ottosson 2008, Kulikov 2006, Eythòrsson 2008, Toyota 2008, van Gelderen 2011 and contributions in Wouk & Ross 2002, Abraham & Leisiö 2006, Malchukov & Siewierska 2011, van Gelderen, Cennamo & Barðdal 2013, among others).
A comprehensive comparative dimension on diachronic issues in the domain of voice, however, is still largely unexplored, both within individual languages and across different language families and types.
The present workshop aims at investigating voice domains from a diachronic comparative perspective, focusing on the extent and limits of variation in the development of different voice patterns/systems in typologically distant and genetically unrelated languages, aiming at identifying possible constant/invariant paths of change as well as points of divergence for one and the same strategy and/or similar clusters of strategies in the rise and evolution of voice phenomena (e.g., the reflexive-middle continuum, passives and impersonals, causativization and anticausativization, serial/auxiliary verbs as passive markers, antipassivization, inverse and focus systems).
Leonid Kulikov (Ghent)
Convenor: Michela Cennamo (University of Naples Federico II)
Contact: ti.aninu|mannecim#ti.aninu|mannecim [https://www.docenti.unina.it/michela.cennamo]
Venue: University of Pavia, Italy
Call for papers:
Contributions are invited, from scholars of different persuasions, on in-depth (preferably corpus-based) investigations of different aspects of the diachrony of voice systems, including (albeit not exclusively)
• the path(s) of development of reflexive-middle voice markers within and across language families and resulting changes (e.g., loss of the passive and middle reflexive and its reflexes in other domains, as in Brazilian Portuguese), the relationship between the spread of the reflexive in impersonal function and its referential scope, pleonastic reflexives and split intransitivity
• auxiliarization/serialization and the rise of voice auxiliaries/markers
• periphrastic passives and changes in tense-aspectual systems, with copula auxiliarization (Dik 1987) as one possible initial stage in the grammaticalization of lexical verbs as voice markers
• the interplay of (tense-)aspectual and argument structure factors in determining the rise of new voice systems
• the emergence of resultative and passive participles and their relationship with the voice system(s) of individual languages
• the role played by language contact in the emergence of new voice patterns
• the rise and development of 'transimpersonals' (Malchukov 2008) in different language families (e.g., Indo-European, Amerindian and Australian languages) and the verb classes involved
• steps and parameters in the rise and development of passive and impersonal constructions (e.g., grammaticalization of existential verbs, types of indefinite/impersonal markers) (Siewierska 2010, Bugaeva 2011, Malchukov & Siewierska 2011)
• changes and paths of change in the coding of the focus systems in the focus voice types
Abstracts are invited for 20-minute talks (plus 10 min. discussion).
They should be no longer than two pages, including examples and references (1 inch margin all around, font 12 pt, notes 10).
Please send Word / Open Office / Word Perfect files and use Unicode fonts.
8 March 2014: Deadline for abstract submission
8 April 2014: Notification of acceptance
11 September 2014: Workshop
Abraham, W. 2006a. Introduction: Passivization and typology. Form vs. function - a confined survey into the research
status quo. In W. Abraham & L. Leisiö (eds), 1-28.
Abraham, W. 2006b. The compositional nature of the analytic passive. Syntactic vs. event semantic triggers. "Argument
Hypothesis" vs. "Aspect Hypothesis". In W. Abraham, & L. Leisiö (eds), 462-501.
Abraham, W. & Leisiö, L. 2006 (eds). Passivization and Typology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
Adelaar, A. 2013. Voice variation in Austronesian languages of Indonesia: Introduction’. In A. Adelaar (ed.), Voice
variation in Austronesian languages of Indonesia. NUSA 54, 1-3 [http://hdl.handle.net/10108/71802].
Allen, C. 2001. The development of a new passive in English. In M. Butt & T.H. King (eds), Time over Matter.
Diachronic Perspectives on Morphosyntax. Stanford: CSLI, 43-72.
Austin, P.K. & Musgrave, S. 2008 (eds). Voice and Grammatical Relations in Austronesian Languages. Stanford:
Barðdal, J. (2004). The Semantics of the Impersonal Construction in Icelandic, German and Faroese: Beyond Thematic
Roles. In W. Abraham (ed), Topics of Germanic Typology [Studia Typologica 6]. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 105-37.
Bugaeva, A. 2011. A diachronic study of the impersonal passive in Ainu. In A. Malchukov & A. Siewierska (eds), 517-
Cennamo, M. 1993. The Reanalysis of Reflexives: a Diachronic Perspective. Naples: Liguori.
Cennamo, M. 1999. Late Latin pleonastic reflexives and the unaccusative hypothesis. Transactions of the Philological
Society 97.1: 103-150.
Cennamo, M. 2005. Passive auxiliaries in Late Latin. In S. Kiss, L. Mondin & G. Salvi (eds), Ètudes de Linguistique
Offertes à József Herman à l'Occasion de son 80ème Anniversaire. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 177-194.
Cennamo M. 2006. The rise and grammaticalization paths of Latin facere and fieri as passive auxiliaries. In. W.
Abraham & L. Leisiö (eds), 311-336.
Cennamo, M. 2007. Auxiliaries and serials between late Latin and early Romance. In D. Bentley & A. Ledgeway
(eds), Sui Dialetti Italo-Romanzi. Saggi in Onore di Nigel B. Vincent. The Italianist 27: 64-87.
Cennamo, M. 2012. Aspectual constraints on the (anti)causative alternation in Old Italian. In J. Barðdal, M. Cennamo
& E. van Gelderen (eds), Argument Realization and Change. Thematic issue of Transactions of the Philological
Society 110.3: 394-421.
Creissels, D. 2007. Impersonal and anti-impersonal constructions: a typological approach. MS, Lyon: University of
Comrie 1985, B. Causative verb formation and other verb-deriving morphology. In T. Shopen (ed), Language
Typology and Syntactic Description. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 309-348.
Cyrino, S. 2013. Argument promotion and se-construction in Brazilian Portuguese. In E. van Gelderen, M. Cennamo, &
J. Barðdal (eds), 285-306.
Dik, S. 1987. Copula auxiliarization: how and why. In M. Harris & P. Ramat (eds), Historical Development of
Auxiliaries. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 53-84.
Eythórsson, T. 2008. The new passive in Icelandic really is a passive. In T. Eythórsson (ed), Grammatical Change and
Linguistic Theory. The Rosendal Papers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 173-220.
Faarlund, J.T. 2005. From clitic to affix: on the history of Scandinavian reflexive verbs. NOWELE 2005: 53-72.
Foley, W.A. & Van Valin, R.D.jr. 1985. Information packaging in the clause. In T. Shopen (ed), vol. 1, 283-364.
Gelderen, E. van. 2011. Valency changes in the history of English. Journal of Historical Linguistics 1.1: 106-
Gelderen, E. van, Cennamo, M. & Barðdal, J. 2013 (eds). Argument Structure in Flux. The Naples-Capri
Papers. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Keenan, E.L. & Dryer, M. 2007. Passive in the world's languages. In T. Shopen (ed), Language Typology and Syntactic
Description, 2nd edition, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 325-361.
Kemmer, S. 1993. The Middle Voice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Klaimam, M.H. 1991. Grammatical Voice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fox, B. & Hopper, P.J. 1994. Voice. Form and Function. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Kulikov, L. 2006. Passive and middle in Indo-European: reconstructing the early Vedic passive paradigm.
In W. Abraham & L. Leisiö (eds), 62-81.
Kulikov, L. 2011. Passive to anticausative through impersonalization: the case of Vedic and Indo-European. In A.
Malchukov & A. Siewierska (eds), 229-254.
Malchukov, A. 2008. Split intransitives, experiencer objects, and "transimpersonal" constructions:
(re-)establishing the connection. In M. Donohue & S. Wichmann (eds), Typology of Languages with
Semantic Alignment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 76-101.
Malchukov, A. & Siewierska, A. 2011 (eds). Impersonal Constructions. A Cross-linguistic Perspective.
Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ottosson, K. 2008. The Old Nordic Middle Voice in the-literary period. In F. Josephson & I. Söhrman (eds),
Interdependence of Diachronic and Synchronic Analyses. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 185-219.
Perlmutter, D. & Rosen, C. 1984 (eds). Studies in Relational Grammar 2. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Ross, M. 2002. The history and transitivity of Western Austronesian voice and voice-marking. In Wouk, F.
& M. Ross (eds), 17-62.
Shibatani, M. 1985. Passives and related constructions. Language 61.4: 821-48.
Shibatani, M.1988 (ed). Passive and Voice. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Siewierska, A. 1984. The Passive. A Comparative Linguistic Analysis. London: Routledge.
Siewierska, A. 2010. From 3PL to passive: incipient, emergent and established passives. Diachronica 27.3: 73-109.
Toyota, J. 2008. Diachronic Change in the English Passive. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
Tsunoda, T. 1988. Antipassives in Warrungu and other Australian languages. In M. Shibatani (ed), 595-649.
Wouk, F. & Ross, M. 2002 (eds). The History and Typology of Western Austronesian Voice Systems.
Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.